Home > Uncategorized > REVIEW – “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen”

REVIEW – “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen”

TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN
*1/2 (out of *****)
Directed by: Michael Bay
Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Frank Welker, John Turturro, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson

Before I dispense with the expected unpleasantries regarding Michael Bay’s latest installment of the “Transformers” franchise, let me first cover the positives in this film.

Megan Fox and Shia LaBeouf cannot believe the racist bullshit unfolding before their eyes in "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"

Megan Fox and Shia LaBeouf cannot believe the racist bull#### unfolding before their eyes in "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen"

For starters, occassionally the giant robots look pretty.  There are two or three moments in the film where the stars align just so and the visuals, combined with well-paced chase/action sequences, provide for some fairly acceptable popcorny fare.  And character-actor Kevin Dunn – who was once considered for the role of George Constanza on “Seinfeld” – turns in a miraculously likable performance as the protagonist’s father despite the best efforts to at some point make the audience hate each and every single human (and most of the robots) introduced in the film.

As for every other aspect of the film, I can only surmise that Michael Bay is the worst kind of auteur – a hateful, shallow, and petty human being whose primary purpose in filmmaking and life is to exhibit as much contempt for his audience as is humanly possible.

What’s fascinating isn’t so much that “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” is a bad movie.  It’s that it’s a bad movie despite an incredible budget, bottomless resources inluding top-notch special effects artists, an otherwise competent cast of actors, a built-in rabid fanbase eager to wax nostalgic with their $10.50, and a simple premise of giant robots that turn into cool cars and fight each other over the fate of the human race.  However, making a movie with an otherwise guaranteed winning formula into a long, drawn-out, frustratingly nonsensical pile of cellulite chaos is what keeps Michael Bay walking around with a constant erection.

The script cannot and does not withstand the on-the-set rewrites of Bay.  I’d perhaps have more respect for him if he were a bit more honest and earnest in his approach and simply started shooting without a script, because I cannot imagine anybody with half a brain in their head writing a script wherein robots that are the equivalent of ten stories tall (though some change size once they re-appear at other points in the film) have a direct conversation with human characters one second and then literally disappear and aren’t seen or mentioned again. It’s quite a feat if it’s intentional and the character is Batman.  Otherwise, disappearing in mid-conversation is a fairly distracting oversight.

Also, I’m positive that nobody but Michael Bay could write the line “it’s another damn day in this godforsaken desert” and have Tyrese Gibson deliver the line in the middle of a scene with absolutely no context whatsoever.  Also, I doubt any screenwriter worth his salt would introduce a midget border patrol agent for the sake of having a midget in the film and then have the pay-off of a five-minute scene with dramatic tension culminate in the non-joke that when you’re in the Middle-East, you just tell people you’re “from New York” and they do whatever you want.  I’m still scratching my head over that one.

As for the accusations of racism, I can only say it’s been quite some time that a film so blatantly racist and wrong-headed has been this widely accepted by the movie-going audience.  I’ve always had my suspicions of Michael Bay’s views on race in the American landscape, particularly since he doesn’t seem to have any use for black people unless they’re providing comic relief or in the military.  I was willing to chalk that one up to the fact that all of Michael Bay’s characters are simple props with all the depth of a turtle-shaped swimming pool hanging off the wall at Walmart until I actually saw the big ears, big lips, buck teeth, and gold tooth on “Skids.”

ABOVE: Not a relic from the Jim Crow museum, but an actual toy sold on store shelves in "post-racial" America.

ABOVE: Not a relic from the Jim Crow museum, but an actual toy sold on store shelves in "post-racial" America.

Yet I haven’t viewed the anger and backlash I would expect from such a blatant and obviously intentional callback to the Stepin Fetchit/pre-Civil Rights black caricature, and perhaps that’s the most frustrating aspect of this film.  If anybody needed proof that we do not live in a “post-racial” society (beyond the use of the term “post-racial” which is self-defeating in its own context), this was it.  The fact that anyone would create the racist caricatures of “Skids and Mudflap” and make them look the way they do is quite shocking, but perhaps not moreso than the fact that I haven’t seen a single protest against the sort of blatant racism that so many people have worked so hard to eradicate over the years. Michael Bay has plead ignorance to the charges and put forth the defense that they’re robots, and therefore cannot be racist black caricatures. By that reasoning, I suppose he should also don blackface and do a few Mammy tunes; after all, it’s not really a black guy, it’s a white dude in blackface. So it can’t be racist, right?

Rather than continue angsting over the detriments of Michael Bay as a filmmaker, perhaps it’s best to just provide a simple and short list of what compromises Michael Bay’s core belief system:

  1. We should celebrate and show proper appreciation for the hard work and amazing contributions of all ten dudes that comprise the entire United States military.
  2. You can direct those ten dudes to go anywhere and do anything with a simple phone call.
  3. Nothing is racist so long as it shines.
  4. Steven Spielberg, Ridley Scott, and John Carpenter are excellent filmmakers and you should steal entire scenes and concepts from them as much as you can.
  5. It’s always best to shoot from the ground and shake the camera during action sequences, lest the audience actually be able to tell what’s going on and enjoy the scene.
  6. People in the Middle-East literally live in ruins in the desert with no electricity or running water.  And yet, they all have cellphones.
  7. Everybody who uses the internet is an a######, but Webcam Dates are serious business.

I guess what I’m trying to say that the level of awful that Michael Bay continually puts out would be hilarious if it weren’t so tragic. But oh well, at least the giant robots crashing into each other provided a brief respite from all that other madness.

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. June 29, 2009 at 12:02 am

    I can’t decide if I’m glad I’ll probably never see this movie or if I really want to just to experience first hand the shear awfulness. After all, everyone loves to stare at a train wreck.

    • June 29, 2009 at 12:12 am

      And that was my goal in going to see this film in the first place. If anything all the negative reviews were encouraging, in that I knew I get a sort of shadenfreudist (let’s pretend that’s a word) joy out of seeing yet another laughably bad Bay film. Laughably bad is one thing, but I wasn’t expecting confoundingly bad.

      And yet, this movie will make a minimum of $400 million in the US alone. Guaranteed.

    • June 29, 2009 at 12:13 am

      DISCLAIMER: I’m normally not that pretentious about blockbuster films that make a lot of money. But if there’s ever a movie that didn’t deserve it, this is it.

  2. Rob
    June 29, 2009 at 3:13 am

    Yes, Skids makes Jar Jar Binks look like Sidney Poitier —but for some reason I can’t explain, I found this a little more palatable than the first Transformers movie. Maybe I’m getting senile.

    And John Turturro always makes me laugh.

    • June 29, 2009 at 12:12 pm

      And for whatever reason I really didn’t have many problems with the first one. If anything I defended it against the rail of “destroying our chilhood memories” by reminding people that the franchise was based on a marketing campaign for children’s toys rather than some great landmark children’s television series. As such I was shocked that Bay didn’t go further in dumbing it down…little did I know I simply had to wait a couple years for that to happen.

      Turturro and Kevin Dunn both deserve to be in more – and better – films.

  3. June 30, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    You really should watch Megan Fox’s interview with Harry Smith on CBS’ The Early Show. The best part was when she told him “I’m in the movie, and I read the script, and I watched the movie, and I still didn’t know what was happening. So, I think if you haven’t read the script, and you go and you see it and you understand it, you may be a genius…. This is a movie for geniuses.”

    http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5124917n

  1. December 22, 2009 at 2:23 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: